St. Michael's Church, built within the grounds
of the Roman fort at Burgh-By-Sands
It
is not my purpose in this chapter to deal with what I consider to be the
misidentification of Glastonbury
with Avalon. Others have presented a detailed case against the fraudulent claim
of Glastonbury
as the final resting place of King Arthur, and I added some of my own arguments to my previous book, THE MYSTERIES OF AVALON.
Here
I wish to restrict my attention to the only known place in Britain to actually
have born the name Avalon prior to the time of Arthur as well as to this place’s
proximity to both Arthur’s Camlann at Castlesteads and his possible ruling
center towards the west end of Hadrian’s Wall.
Obviously,
the possible location of his grave at Avalon
is of great interest to anyone seeking to demonstrate the reality of a
historical Arthur. Geoffrey of Monmouth’s ‘Insula Avallonis’ or ‘Isle of Avalon’
is held by most Arthurian scholars to be a purely mythological designation - no
matter where one chooses to localize it.
From
a philological standpoint, the –on terminal of Avallon or Avalon demands an
original terminal fronted by a broad vowel. Thus there is a problem trying to equate
the word with Welsh afallen, ‘apple tree’, or Cornish avallen. This problem can
be overcome in two ways: 1) by evoking an attested Continental place-name, e.g.
Aballone, modern Avallon, in France or by 2) allowing for the possibility that
the plural form of Welsh afal, afalau, cf. Cornish avalow and Breton avalou, at
some point underwent a fairly common miscopying of u/w as n.
As
it happens, the only known site in all of Roman Britain to bear an ‘Avalon’
name is the Aballava fort at Burgh-By-Sands, 5. miles west of Stanwix on
Hadrian’s Wall. This fort is under 14
miles west of Castlesteads. The name Aballava is found listed in the various
early sources in the following forms:
Aballava
– Rudge Cup and Amiens patera
Aballavensium
– RIB inscription No. 883
Avalana,
Avalava – Ravenna Cosmography
Aballaba
– Notitia Dignitatum
It
is the one spelling in the Ravenna Cosmography that stands out here. The v of Aballava/Avalava
has been rendered as an n, yielding the spelling Avalana. This is exactly the type
of spelling we would need to end up with Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Latinized
Avallonis.
The
Celtic derivational suffix –ava of Aballava, British
*-aua, is now found in the –au of Welsh, giving as a meaning for Insula
Avallonis ‘Island of
the Apple-trees’.
An
Arthur who fell at Camlann/Camboglanna at Castlesteads
could easily have been carted along the Roman road or brought down the river
system in this region to Burgh-By-Sands.
Camboglanna
is on the Irthing, a tributary of the Eden
River. The Eden empties into the Solway Firth
very near Aballava/Avalana.
Two
dedications to a goddess Latis were made at the Birdoswald Roman fort, 7 miles
east of Castlesteads, and at Aballava. The first (RIB 1897) is addressed to DIA
LATI and the second to DEAE LATI.
Latis comes from a British root similar to Proto-Celtic *lati-, ‘liquid, fluid’,
and Proto-Indo- European *lat-, ‘wet’. Some authorities have seen in her a
goddess of beer (cf. Old Irish laith, ‘ale, liquor’), but here she is
manifestly a goddess of open bodies of fresh water, i.e. she is a literal ‘Lady
of the Lake’. Burgh-By-Sands was, in fact, surrounded by vast marshlands.
Although these lands have long since been drained, the area is still called ‘Burgh
Marsh’. We can be fairly certain, then, that the Avalon fort was on an island
of sorts, the true ‘Insula’ of Geoffrey of
Monmouth’s
apple-tree Otherworld.
Topography
dictated the position of the Aballava fort. There was an important crossing of
the Solway at Burgh and the existence of this crossing may have influenced the
siting of the Roman fort here. The fort sits atop a low hill on the highest
ground at the east end of the village. The church sits within the south-east
corner of the fort and is partly built of Roman stones. The modern road lies on
the line of the Wall. Burgh is one of the least explored and understood of all the
forts on the Wall. Although earlier visitors presumed a fort here, no remains
were visible.
Excavations
north of the church in 1922, when a new burial ground was formed, resulted in
the location of the east wall, 6-7 ft thick, with an earth backing, and the
east gate of the fort, with a road leading out. Within the fort, stone
buildings running north-south were interpreted as barracks-blocks. The Roman
levels and buildings were all badly preserved.
The
sketch plan of the site prepared on the basis of these discoveries suggests a
fort measuring 520 ft north-south by 410 ft east-west, giving an area of nearly
5 acres. Excavations on several occasions between 1978 and 2002 south and east
of the fort has led to the discovery of buildings, presumably of the civil
settlement. The bath-house, south of the fort, was destroyed in making the
canal, itself replaced by the railway line, now also abandoned. Further south,
the tombstone of a Dacian tribesman may indicate the location of the cemetery.
Recent excavations have failed to clarify the location, size and date of the
Wall fort at Burgh. We do know the stone fort lay astride the Wall, but the
Wall ditch was infilled and re-cut before it was constructed. It is possible
that the fort to the south of the Wall at
Moorhouse
was retained for some time before being succeeded by a replacement astride the Wall.
As
stated above, the actual Roman period cemetery at Burgh-By-Sands/Aballava is
said have been to the south of the fort. When I enquired about the tombstone of
the Dacian tribesman found in this cemetery, Tim Padley at the Tullie House
Museum in Carlisle informed me of the discovery of two other fragments. All
three are listed in the Roman Inscriptions of Britain as follows:
2046
(tombstone)
...
IVL
PII... TINVS CIVES DACVS
2047
(tombstone) D M S
...
2048
(tombstone) VII
Alas,
according to Mr. Padley, the placement of the cemetery to the ‘south of the
fort’ puts it, in his words, ‘near the vallum, possibly destroyed by the canal
and railway.’
The
tombstone fragments were in the care of Tullie House when they disappeared.
While
it is impossible to know whether Arthur was buried in the Roman period cemetery
of the Aballava
fort, this cemetery must remain a primary candidate for the location of his
grave.
In
a section of my book THE MYSTERIES OF AVALON, I included the following note
detailing one of the supposed sites for Arthur’s grave. As it happens, this
tradition matches the one that places Camlan on the Afon Gamlan in NW Wales.
A
Note on Northwestern Wales as the Site of Arthur’s
Grave
There
are a few Camlans/Gamlans in northwestern Wales or Gwynedd. The presence of these
sites has prompted various Arthurian scholars to propose that Arthur fought his
last and fatal battle in this region. The modern champions of this notion are
Steve Blake and Scott Lloyd, whose book PENDRAGON: THE DEFINITIVE ACCOUNT OF
THE ORIGINS OF KING ARTHUR, was released in 2003 by Lyons press.
We
cannot ignore these Camlans or Gamlans (the most noteworthy being the Afon
Gamlan, a river) when searching for a historical Arthur. Unlike the placement
of Camlan (or Camlann) in Cornwall,
something done by Geoffrey of Monmouth in his HISTORY OF THE KINGS OF BRITAIN,
Gwynedd can claim to possess real candidates for Arthur’s final battle site.
The only other known site that qualifies linguistically is much further north –
Camboglanna on Hadrian’s Wall, which I have discussed above in Chaper 3.
Blake
and Lloyd place their trust in a very late medieval source, the VERA HISTORIA
MORTE DE ARTHURI, a work dated in extant MSS. to c. 1300,
although perhaps to originals dating between 1199 and 1203. According to Blake
and Lloyd, the VERA HISTORIA probably was written in Gwynedd. I will not
contest this point, as it may well be correct.
The
importance of the VERA HISTORIA lies in its placement of Arthur’s interment –
and thus of Avalon – in Gwynedd. Although Blake and Lloyd are familiar with the
Gwynedd tradition which places Arthur’s grave at Carnedd Arthur near Cwm-y-llan
or Cym Llan (an error for Cwm Llem, the Valley of the river Llem), they choose
to ignore this bit of folklore and instead settle on Tre Beddau
near Llanfair, well to the east on the Conwy River, as the actual burial place
of the king. They deduce this from the fact that the VERA HISTORIA states that
the grave is near a church of St. Mary (in Welsh, Llan-fair), and that archaeologists
have recently uncovered a Dark Age or 6th century cemetery at Tre Beddau.
[Note:
Cwm Llan is a very clumsy attempt at rendering Camlan, and is obviously
spurious tradition.]
Unfortunately,
the authors of PENDRAGON also choose to ignore the description of the burial place
of Arthur as preserved in the VERA HISTORIA. In their own words, the burial of
Arthur after Camlan is told as follows:
“…
the VERA HISTORIA describes the funeral of Arthur as taking place at a chapel
dedicated to the Virgin, the entrance to which was so narrow that the mourners
had to enter by first forcing their shoulder into the gap and then dragging the
rest of their body through the opening. While the funeral took place inside the
chapel, a large storm blew up and a mist descended, so thick that is was
impossible to see the body of Arthur – which had been left outside, as it would
not fit into the chapel. Following the storm the mourners came out to find that
the body had gone and the tomb prepared for Arthur was sealed shut, ‘such that
it rather seemed to be one single stone’.”
Now,
this passage quite obviously DOES NOT portray a 6th century Christian cemetery.
Rather, it is a fitting description of a ‘chapel’ comparable to the “Green
Chapel’ of SIR GAWAIN AND THE GREEN KNIGHT. In other words, the said ‘chapel’
is a Neolithic chambered tomb, whose passage is so tight as to barely allow the
entrance of the mourners.
Furthermore,
we are talking about TWO conjoined passage tombs – one that is the chapel of the
Virgin, and the other which mysteriously receives the body of King Arthur. In
all of Gwynedd, there is only one such ancient monument: that of the double
chamber tomb of Dyffryn Ardudwy not far west of the Afon Gamlan.
One
of the two chambers of Dyffryn Ardudwy is actually known as Coetan Arthur or Arthur’s
Quoit. The “Virgin” is here a Christian embellishment on what would have been a
pagan goddess associated with the Otherworld site.
The
grave of Arthur discussed in the VERA HISTORIA is thus a product of folklore
only. It can thus be dismissed as an actual grave of Arthur.
Granted,
we cannot so easily dismiss the Camlans/Gamlans in northwestern Wales. Since
writing this, Dr. Jessica Hughes of CADW has sent me information via snail-mail
that adds important details to the description of the Dyffryn Ardudwy chambered
tombs. To quote Dr. Hughes:
“The
Chambered tomb at Dyffryn Ardudwy has been known as Coetan Arthur in the past,
indeed antiquarian reports of the site refer to Dyffryn
as ‘Coetan Arthur’. However, the name appears to refer to the whole of the
monument as opposed to a particular chamber. Interestingly (and maybe somewhat
confusingly), one mile to the east of Dyffryn lies another chambered tomb known
as ‘Cors-y-Gedal’. This was also known in the past as ‘Coetan Arthur’…
Regarding whether there is a church of St. Mary in proximity to Dyffryn Ardudwy,
I have found a church 4 miles north of Dyffryn in the village of Llanfair.
“
The
enclosed Detail Report on this Church of St. Mary
states that Llanfair was dedicated to Mary “by at least the 12c when Gerald of
Wales and Archbishop Bladwin stayed there in 1188…”
Here
is the COFLEIN listing for the second chambered cairn:
http://www.coflein.gov.uk/en/site/93724/detai
ls/CORS-Y-GEDOL%2C+BURIAL+CHAMBER/
“A
rather tapering rectilinear cairn, c.31m NESW by 14.5m, showing at its eastern
end a number of orthostats, partly supporting a tipped capstone, c.3.6m by 3.0m
& 0.45m thick: a spindlewhorl, thought to be IA, is said to have come from
under the capstone.”
Both
of these chambered tombs are directly west of the Afon Gamlan.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.